PATIENTS caught in legal standoff as department challenges order to provide urgent radiation oncology services.
The Gauteng Department of Health is facing mounting legal pressure to provide life-saving cancer treatment to almost 3 000 patients who have been waiting for radiation oncology services, some for over three years.
Now, the department finds itself studying a court ruling that orders immediate provision of these services while simultaneously pursuing an appeal that has temporarily suspended the directive, creating a complex legal standoff with devastating human consequences.
The crisis began when advocacy groups Cancer Alliance and Section27 took the department to court, alleging the violation of patients' constitutional rights to healthcare due to extensive treatment delays.
Their case gained traction when it emerged that the department had R784 million allocated specifically for oncology services since March 2023, yet it had failed to take meaningful action to address the backlog.
In July, the Joburg High Court ruled decisively in favour of the advocacy groups, finding the department's inaction to be both unlawful and unconstitutional.
The court ordered immediate provision of oncology services to the thousands of waiting patients.
However, victory for cancer patients was short-lived.
Soon after the ruling, the Gauteng Health Department successfully filed for leave to appeal, automatically suspending the court order, pending the appeal process.
Undeterred, Cancer Alliance and Section27 fought back with a counter-application in the Gauteng High Court, seeking to enforce the original ruling while the appeal proceeds.
The court approved this application, recognising that ongoing delays were denying patients treatment at crucial timelines for their health.
ALSO READ | Killed like a dog for 'stealing' puppiesOpens in new window
The extended delays have resulted in alarming consequences, with patient deaths and significant health deterioration among those still waiting for treatment.
Acting Judge Stephen van Nieuwenhuizen captured the urgency of the situation: "These patients are facing life-threatening illness. If they do not receive treatment, they may not survive. In the absence of such treatment, their health continues to deteriorate significantly."
The judge was particularly critical of the department's response, noting that "actual, irreparable harm has already occurred, continues to occur and is reasonably apprehended. The provincial Health respondents, however, ignore this."
Gauteng Health spokesman Motalatale Modiba offered a measured response to the legal developments.
"The department has acknowledged the judgment and will determine and communicate appropriate course of action once a review is complete."
This cautious approach reflects the department's attempt to navigate legal complexities while facing mounting pressure to provide treatment to patients who have already endured years-long delays.
Cancer Alliance director Salomé Meyer had initially hailed the original ruling as a "landmark decision" and "a significant victory for health and human rights in South Africa".
However, she has consistently criticised the department's lack of transparency with affected patients throughout the crisis.
Advocacy groups continue to push for immediate action, emphasising that legal technicalities should not override urgent medical needs of thousands of cancer patients.
